Hit And Run Case: Mumbai Police Issue 16 Mistakes In The Salman Khan Probe

Salman-Hit-&-Run-Case-1[tps_footer]After Bombay High Court acquitted Bollywood actor Salman Khan in 2002 hit and run case, a Mumbai Police official has issued a circular highlighting the lapses in the investigation, which the high court pointed out in its judgment.

CLICK HERE FOR ALL BOX OFFICE UPDATES

Troubles are not ending for the Bajrangi Bhaijaan star, as a senior Mumbai Police official, KMM Prasanna, has issued 16 points circular to all the police stations in order to prevent from repeating the same mistakes in the future cases. KMM Prasanna has asked all the police officers to learn the 16 points circular so that the goof ups don’t happen again in future.

ALL LATEST BIGG BOSS 9 WITH SALMAN KHAN STORIES CLICK HERE

Last year, in December, the Maharashtra government decided to approach the Supreme Court against the acquittal of actor Salman Khan in 2002 hit and run case. Reportedly, the government had decided to move a Special Leave Petition to file the appeal against the actor’s acquittal for the five-year sentence.

CLICK HERE FOR ALL LATEST BOLLYWOOD UPDATES

Here are the 16 points mentioned in the circular:

1. Bills were collected from Rain Bar in Santacruz, where the prosecution had alleged that Salman Khan drank liquor, without due certification under Section 65 (B) of the Evidence Act.

2. Bills of JW Marriott Hotel and parking tag were seized by the police but were not shown in the panchanama, creating doubts about the evidence regarding where the actor went after leaving Rain Bar.

3. There are handwritten endorsements on the computer extracts in the bills of Rain Bar, but no evidence was collected as to who took the said endorsements, and how.

4. The actor was available from the morning of September 28, 2002, for medical test at the Bandra police station, but he was only taken to JJ Hospital in the afternoon for blood sample collection.

5. While the blood sample of the deceased, Narula, was taken at Bhabha Hospital, why was the actor’s blood sample collected at JJ Hospital? No explanation was given.

6. Though the blood samples had come on September 28, 2002, to the Bandra police station from JJ Hospital, they were sent to the Forensic Laboratory in Kalina only on September 30, 2002. Till then, they were kept in the police station where, the court had said, they might have been either tampered with or not stored properly.

7. A chain of custody of blood samples was not properly established and because of the missing link, biological evidence was not trustworthy.

8. Statement of the constable who brought blood samples of accused from hospital to police station was not recorded and he was not examined.

9. Important anomaly – 6 ml of blood extracted from actors body in two containers, but FDL received only 4 ml of blood.

10. Receiving clerk of FSL not examined.

11. The investigating officer did not verify the medical papers while collecting them. Blood collection reports shows many discrepancies and defects, which were admitted.

12. No charge under Section 66 (i) (b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act was framed.

13. In two places, the FIR was altered, but no explanation was given.

14. Under Section 161, statements were not recorded of witness. Nobody says Salman was driving the vehicle.

15. The defence had said that the tyre had burst, which was the reason of the crash but the tyre was not sent to the forensic laboratory to deny their claims.

16. Actor Kamal Khan was not summoned to the trial when his address was available with cops though he could have been a great witness for the police.[/tps_footer]

About Author

BusinessofCinema News Network

Learn More →