Shocking! Kangana Ranaut Called Hrithik Roshan’s Father, Is This What She Told Him?

Hrithik-Roshan-&-Kangana[tps_footer]Kangana Ranaut and Hrithik Roshan’s war of words has taken a drastic turn with legalities now involved. Kangana who started the war with indirectly targeting Hrithik on a public platform received back lash from the Bang Bang actor on the micro blogging site Twitter.

After all said and done the matter was assumed to be over until Hrithik sent Kangana a legal notice for ruining his image. The actor has now filed a legal notice which states that Kangana should apologize for the loss done and call a press conference and clear out the same.

CLICK HERE FOR ALL BOX OFFICE UPDATES

Well, just after the actor sent her a legal notice, the Queen actress too took a stand and sent him a legal notice. Another revelation during the course of the tiff has come about. In the notice sent by Hrithik Roshan it is mentioned that the Rangoon actress had called Hrithik ’s father and had also told him to handle his son.

The notice reads, “You have misconstrued our client’s silence and dignity as a weakness and started being more and more impudent. You had the audacity to call his father and give him advice on how to handle his son, who, you said, is chasing you via mails and phone calls. His father also explained and conveyed to you that you had misunderstood the situation and that our client is not interested in you.”

CLICK HERE FOR ALL LATEST BOLLYWOOD UPDATES

Nevertheless, Kangana Ranaut’s notice pin points the rapport she once shared with the Mohenjo Daro actor. The starlet’s notice reads out, “That she was invited to a private birthday party in January 2011 ‘with select guests’ establishes the fact that your client was not only professionally associated (with her) but was also personally close. And this was before she signed Krrish 3. She also attended your sister’s birthday party in January 2012.”

The notice further reads, “Pursuant to this my client attended your father’s birthday party in September 2013, which was a private affair with select guests. These facts are sufficient to prove that my client was never a stranger to your client or his family, and therefore your client blatantly cannot deny the same to suit his convenience.”

With so many intrinsic details, one cannot know when this tug of war will end![/tps_footer]